In his book, Salt and
the Columbian State, author Joshua Rosenthal uses the salt monopoly
established by the Columbian government in the 19th century as a
lens to view state building and organization following the end of Spanish
colonialism in the Americas. A story of conflict and struggle, the analysis
highlights the influential role a commodity can take within society and how
political goals of modernization and organization can be pushed through control
and taxation of goods such as salt. The author argues that while in retrospect,
state policies may have been weak or unsuccessful, they had a lasting effect on
the daily lives of the people in the region and the economy as a whole. Using
the salt works of La Salina as a microcosm, Rosenthal breaks down and evaluates
the issues of fiscal policies and implementation and sheds light on the
situation of the country during a tumultuous and changing time period.
Overall, I was most interested in how the implementation of
many of the reforms and fiscal policies of the Columbian state actually
decreased economic diversity and raised tensions against the state in areas
such as La Salina. Following the enactment of the state monopoly on salt,
indigenous residents were pushed out of La Salina and their communal lands were
divided for state use. Forced to resettle on the outskirts of the town and to
replace the incomes they had made in the past from producing and selling salt,
the residents turned to cultivating firewood or producing ceramics, occupations
that both eliminated subsistence farming in the region and barely provided
necessary incomes. Therefore, while salt production in the region was a
successful source of revenue for the government, it actually hurt the people of
the region as it forced them out of their homes and stripped them of their
livelihoods. Throughout the end of the 19th century, the anger felt
by those impoverished by the changes would continually flare up, and many wars
and rebellions occurred as a consequence of these tensions created by state
control. Ironically, the state building techniques implemented by the
government were at once developing national revenue while at the same time
destroying national unity and homogeneity. For readers in the modern day,
tensions rising from a basic commodity such as salt are surprising because it
is readily and cheaply available. However, in the 19th century the
commodity was much harder to produce and its necessity made it an important
issue of contention.
No comments:
Post a Comment