After reading the Colour of
Paradise, it was hard for me to make the transition to view salt as a valuable
commodity in comparison to the emerald, which was the topic of the previous
book. Joshua Rosenthal discusses in his
book titled Salt and the Colombian Stat
the strong sense of rebuilding held by the Colombian people after the
colonization. Even though he
acknowledges that the Colombians did not have a strong political figure or a revolution
similar to the Mexicans, yet they were able to socially reconstruct the
country. I was not fully convinced that
he gave sufficient credit or agency to the indigenous population, because he
did not them as ones creating the change.
However, the author shows the indigenous people’s abilities of adjusting
to multiple political and social changes.
One aspect that I value about commodity is the
social life of the product and ways in which it relates to factors such as
consumption, supply and demand. Even
though Rosenthal highlights the social changes that were created by salt in the
Colombia’s period of nation building and transformation, however he does not
capture the same changes that Mintz mention in his book about sugar. I feel that Mintz better discusses the ways
in which commodities did a full social restructure through consumption. In addition, Mintz to restructure commodity
like sugar moves through the social classes starting mainly with the
elites. Maybe if Rosenthal used another
commodity other than salt he would make a more solid argument. Overall the book is history-based and
displays life after colonization in Columbia, but it is not a book that clearly
and effectively articulated some of its arguments.
No comments:
Post a Comment